Click Here for the rest of this issue
Socialist Party Home
Anti-refugee government exposed by
Afghan asylum seekers' hunger strike

Kevin McLoughlin

Everybody has the right to live in decent conditions with a sense of security. Real problems like poverty wages and lack of money, poor services, lack of a home and fear of abuse or violence blight the lives of many Irish people.

Recently such conditions continuing over a number of years provoked over 40 people into organising a protest to demand their rights. That was how the protest of the Afghani men and students started on Sunday 14 May.

The united hostility from the political establishment and the media, some of whom portrayed the Afghani protesters as manipulative spivs, terrorists and abusers in a number of unsubstantiated reports, was a disgrace.

The Afghani protesters were at different stages in the asylum process but the majority had their initial cases rejected. Cut off from society in hostels for up to five years in some cases, not allowed to work, and not knowing what the future holds – all this is a recipe for isolation and desperation. Ireland and Denmark are the only two countries in the EU who have maintained a ban on asylum seekers working.

Despite claims by Michael McDowell to the contrary, Afghanistan is a war-torn, poverty-ridden country, the bulk of which is in the hands of vicious warlords, including the Taliban, to which it is not safe for these men to return.

Even by international standards very few people here are granted asylum (less than 10%), very few appeals are granted, and very few others are given "leave to remain". The Refugee Appeals Tribunal is the only such body in English speaking countries that isn’t obliged to publish the basis for its decisions. Two people have resigned from the Tribunal in opposition to its bias.

That a small number of people from the area around St Patrick’s Cathedral came down to abuse the asylum seekers does reflect a certain sentiment that exists in society but the media overstated the significance of this group. Many other locals came down to show their support.

Polls indicated that a majority of people were not sympathetic to the Afghanis but that situation could have been different. The hunger strike and the occupation of the Cathedral was not understood or seen as justified by a lot of people given that the refugees weren’t under immediate threat of deportation. The State and the media portrayed the refugees as taking provocative action to justify their intransigent position.

Last year in the case of Kunle, the school student from Nigeria, there was a lot of public support because the State was seen to have acted in a disgraceful way. This was linked to the positive impact the quick action of his schoolmates had on people’s attitudes.

The preparedness of the Afghanis to make a militant stance for their rights is to be applauded. However it is clear is that, if possible, there needs to be activity and preparation in advance of such struggles in order to win public support which is essential to defeat the anti-refugee and racist position of the State.

See also:

School students take a stand against deportations
Afghan asylum seekers hunger strike ended by Gardai
Desperate hunger strikers should be granted asylum!
Stop Irish Govt deporting innocent people to Afghanistan