Click Here for the rest of this issue
Socialist Party Home
North - Abolition - not delay
Now or later... WE WON'T PAY!

Tommy Black, We Won’t Pay Campaign and Socialist Party

The mass opposition to water charges has put the government – and the local politicians – on the ropes. Just a few weeks ago, Peter Hain was insisting that the charges were now law and irreversible. Local parties were opposing non-payment and therefore calling on people to pay the first bills.

But the overwhelming support for non-payment has forced them all back. They know that if the charges go ahead in April, the mass of people are going to refuse to pay them.

And they also know that there is very little they can do about it. They know this because non-payment groups are now getting active on the ground throughout Belfast and in towns and even villages across the North.

Recent We Won’t Pay Campaign meetings have been packed to the door with hundreds signing up to the Campaign. Dozens more meetings are being planned. The We Won’t Pay hotline is buzzing with calls from people looking to join and get active.

This is why the politicians are trying to get the charges put back. It is not that they are opposed to water charges – they were the people who, in the old Assembly, initially decided to bring them in.
They are retreating because they do not want the first item of a new Assembly to be how to break the resistance of a mass non-payment campaign.

We Won't Pay Stall, Belfast

A delay in the charges would be a victory for those campaigning to build non-payment. But a delay is not enough. The charges must be abolished completely.

If they do put the charges back, it will be in the hope that the opposition mood will die down. Then they would try to introduce these charges in some form at a later date.

The lesson we should draw from any retreat by the government and the local parties is that the campaign is succeeding and the pressure must be maintained and stepped up. We need to get the message across loud and clear – "We won’t pay now and we won’t pay later."

We are winning on this. We have shown that when working class communities stand together in determined action, we have the power to defeat all the force that the government and the establishment use to try to break us.

If united resistance can force them back on water charges, similar determined action can defeat them on hospital and education cuts and privatisation, on low wages and on the rest of the anti working class agenda that is the common ground of all establishment politicians, North, South and at Westminster.

Join up now

To join an existing We Won’t Pay Group or to set up a group in your area, phone the campaign hotline: 028 90311778. We can then give the number of your local organiser or else help you set up a local group if there isn’t one in your area. You can also contact the campaign by email: wewontpay@btconnect.com or check out the campaign website: www.wewontpaycampaign.com


Our message is simple:
"We Won't Pay!"

Gary Mulcahy, We Won’t Pay Campaign Secretary

The main issue in the election campaign was not sectarian mistrust, but the introduction of water charges - These are not the words of The Socialist but of Secretary of State Peter Hain. This incredible admission is yet another acknowledge-ment of the deep and widespread opposition to water charges and privatisation.

This massive opposition has brought it home to the government and to the local politicians that the charges, as they stand, are unimplementable. During the election, they were all forced to change their position, making up a policy as they went along.

The DUP started out calling for meters and for a cap on the charge. By the end of the election, they were forced to say the charges where a "deal breaker".

Why have they all shifted ground? For one simple reason – the strength of the non-payment campaign has left them with no choice.

The lesson is clear – non-payment is winning. Non-payment has forced the politicians to try to come up with some alternative way of introducing these charges. As we go to press, it is not clear whether this will be over a longer period or in a different form.

They are retreating and we need to respond by stepping up the pressure, not by lowering our guard. We need to build the We Won’t Pay Campaign in every community so that we force the complete abolition of the charges.

What is now happening confirms the stand that the Socialist Party, together with other trade union and community activists, took several years ago in launching the We Won’t Pay Campaign. The Campaign has succeeded in getting almost 100,000 people to sign the non-payment pledge and has built local groups across Northern Ireland.

It was We Won’t Pay Campaign and Socialist Party members in the trade unions who raised motions calling on the unions to support non-payment. Even though the leadership of NIPSA and NIC-ICTU opposed non-payment, the floors of the conferences voted overwhelmingly in favour of our motions. The We Won’t Pay Campaign has been the only consistent campaign in the communities, which in turn has resulted in building mass support for non-payment.

This has been done in spite of the conscious opposition of the major political parties who have done their best to confuse people into paying water charges. Some have attempted to use the experience of the Rents and Rates strike in the early 70s as a way of cutting across support for non-payment.

But they do not explain the huge differences between the two campaigns. They are fundamentally different types of campaigns in a number of ways. Unlike the Rent and Rates strike, support for mass non-payment of water charges exists across the sectarian divide. And as importantly, the We Won’t Pay Campaign is an organised campaign controlled and democratically run by its members. This type of democratic structure was a missing ingredient in the Rent and Rates strike which allowed politicians and others to abandon people with debts which would take years to pay off.

The We Won’t Pay Campaign has already built local groups and mass support in many parts of the North, but this needs to be built on and spread across the country to resist the charges when and in whatever form they come in.

They can't beat us through the courts

One of the lies which politicians and others have been spreading is that people’s benefits will be deducted if they don’t pay. But nothing can happen to people who don’t pay water charges if they are not called to Court and even then, it is not guaranteed that people’s benefits will be cut.

Northern Ireland Water Ltd., the new water company, cannot cut off your water if you don’t pay the charges. It is illegal for anyone to cut off your water. Like any other utility company, there are strict procedures the company must follow before people can be called to Court. They must give everybody at least 28 days before a reminder letter is sent out looking for payment. It is likely that many of these letters will be sent using threatening language to try and scare people into paying. There is no reason for people to feel scared, non-payment of water charges is not a criminal act.

Because of this, the company can only attempt to bring people to the Small Claims’ Court, not the Magistrates’ Court. Only criminal cases can be heard by the Magistrates’ Court.

However, the Small Claims’ Court is currently buried with cases and is incapable of dealing with a surge of non-payment of water charges cases. Because of this, the government has decided that the Magistrates’ Court will be allowed to facilitate cases of the Small Claims’ Court to try and deal with the avalanche of non-payment of water charges cases.

The very fact that the government have done this is a grudging recognition of that there will be mass non-payment. But even the Magistrates’ Court will not be able to deal with non-payment. There are not enough Court staff or Courts to deal with tens of thousands of cases. The whole legal system will face gridlock as non-payment will clog up the courts.

But in order to give people confidence and build the necessary solidarity for non-payment to sustain and spread, it is necessary to build a mass membership of the We Won’t Pay Campaign in all areas. The Campaign is in the process of organising many meetings in areas such as Ballymena, Larne, Enniskillen, Beechmount, Poleglass, Shankill Road, Lagmore, Bawnmore, Rathcoole, Bloomfield and many others.

Successful conference a major boost to Campaign

More than 140 activists attended the first conference of the We Won’t Pay Campaign at Transport House, Belfast on 10 March.

This excellent attendance was an inspiration to everybody and was further proof that the We Won’t Pay Campaign has succeeded in building an active membership-based Campaign even before water charges are introduced.

We Won't Pay Conference, 10 March 2007

The morning session concentrated on how mass non-payment campaigns can succeed. Dublin Socialist Party councillor Clare Daly, who was the North Dublin organiser of the Dublin Anti-Water Charges Federation, explained how mass non-payment defeated water charges in the South during the 90s.

Steve Score, ex-Secretary of the Leicestershire Anti-Poll Tax Federation, gave details of how the anti-poll tax struggle defeated Margaret Thatcher managed to organise 18 million people to refuse to pay.

We Won’t Pay Campaign secretary, Gary Mulcahy, stressed that the courts were incapable of dealing with mass non-payment. Even though the Magistrates’ Court will be used to facilitate cases of the Small Claims’ Court, this would still not be enough to deal with tens of thousands of non-payers.

The Magistrates’ Court and Small Claims’ Court are both under pressure dealing with cases as it is. The overwhelming majority of people who refuse to pay will never see the inside of a court.

The second half of the conference discussed how the Campaign organises itself and is structured. An expanded Officers’ Committee was elected and it was also agreed to set up fundraising and legal working groups. Motions on 31 March demonstration in Belfast and on the need for a single united membership based, mass non-payment Campaign organised in the communities were passed unanimously.

It was also agreed that each group call local meetings to elect delegates to the Delegates’ Committee and also to discuss building for the 31 March demonstration.

Build one united democratic campaign

The We Won’t Pay Campaign has grown to become the established non-payment Campaign in most areas. The slogan “We Won’t Pay” is now the popular slogan of the anti-water charges movement.

This has been down to the consistent Trojan work of activists of the Campaign in their local communities over years. To organise non-payment, it is essential that a campaign is built across Northern Ireland which structures itself on a geographic basis, on a paid-up membership and is democratically organised in the local communities. This is how the We Won’t Pay Campaign is structured.

Democratic control and accountability is essential to build non-payment. That is why a campaign which structures itself on existing structures such as trade unions or community and voluntary groups is not sufficient. There is no way for householders to democratically participate and if necessary, change the leadership or tactics of such a campaign.

The We Won’t Pay Campaign believes there should be one united mass non-payment campaign along the lines described above. The Campaign has already made formal approaches to Communities Against the Water Tax with proposals to build a united campaign, but has yet to receive any reply.

We will continue to build support for our proposals and would appeal to everyone to unite to build a single mass non-payment campaign.

£500,000 spent on government water lies

The We Won’t Pay Campaign held a picket outside the Department of Regional Development in February demanding to know how much taxpayers’ money has been wasted on the multi-media water charges propaganda campaign.

A letter was handed to a Department representative to be delivered to David Cairns, Minster for water charges. Here is some of the text of the letter: "It is our understanding that the government has wasted over half a million pounds of taxpayers’ money on paying for TV, radio and newspaper adverts, billboards and sending out so-called information packs and action packs to every home.

"This money is supposed to be invested into public services such as our neglected water and sewerage systems, not to spread lies about water charges…. The Department should release the total amount spent immediately."


Resisting water privatisation
A worldwide revolt

Ciaran Mulholland

In 2002 the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights declared, "The human right to water is indispensable for leading a life in human dignity. Water, and water facilities and services, must be affordable for all."

Under the capitalist system this assertion is an empty promise. The United Nations makes its grand declarations but other global institutions, such as the IMF and World Bank, attack human rights and human dignity. After destroying public-service provision through years of "structural- adjustment programmes", they now push deregulation and privatisation as solutions to the world's water problems.

Both the World Bank and IMF insist on the privatisation of water services as a precondition for their funding. It is not for nothing that Ghana's most celebrated comedian, Ajax Bokana, has described the IMF as the "International Monsters Fraternity" and the World Bank as the "World Bullies".

The world water business is now a $400 billion a year global business. Four water companies are in the top hundred corporations in the world, including the French giants Suez and Vivendi Universal. With only 5 per cent of water services in private hands, expansion opportunities are estimated at a trillion dollars. Gérard Mestrallet, CEO of Suez, puts the industry position clearly: "Water is an efficient product. It is a product which normally would be free, and our job is to sell it. But it is a product which is absolutely necessary to life."

The transnationals cherry-pick the most profitable sectors, demand upgrades of existing infrastructure from the public purse, shed staff, raise prices and cut off people unable to pay.

When the public water system of El Alto and the Bolivian capital La Paz were privatized in 1997, a private consortium took control of water-Aguas del Illimani, owned jointly by Suez, and among others, an arm of the World Bank. Within weeks of taking over the public water company of Cochabamba, American giant Bechtel hiked up rates by as much as 200%, far beyond what the city's poor could afford to pay. Lack of access to clean water is major cause of child illness in Bolivia, where nearly one in ten children dies before age five.

In Cochabamba the issue of water privatization exploded in 2000 when massive protests, which quickly took on insurrectionary proportions, forced out the private companies. In 2004-2005 there was a new water revolt in the city of El Alto. There the new private owners of the water service raised water prices by 35% when it took over. The cost for new families to hook up their homes to water and sewage was more than $445, more than six months’ income at the national minimum wage. Again a huge wave of strikes and protests forced the private companies out. 

It is not only in South America that the private sector vultures have descended.  Since 1995 the World Bank has been pushing the Ghanaian government to privatize the country's water service. In March 2002 the IMF stated that Ghana would get the next tranche of a loan it was due (under the so-called Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility) only if it aimed for "full cost recovery" in all public utilities, including water.

The private companies in Ghana have been allowed to pick up the lucrative urban water service, leaving the less profitable sewerage and sanitation services and rural water provision for local authorities and communities to manage.

Typhoid and cholera have become leading killers in the cities. The Ministry of Health has estimated that 70 per cent of diseases in Ghana are water related. The result is that Ghana, which was on the way to eradicating guinea worm, has become the second most endemic country in the world, following only war-torn Sudan.

As in Bolivia mass movements right across the world are resisting water privatization. Privatization has been prevented in numerous cities including Toronto in Canada and Grenoble in France. Nicaragua and Uruguay have passed legislation against privatisation, though the IMF is squeezing Nicaragua to accept privatization.

AL-Hassan Adam of the Teachers and Educational Workers Union in Ghana puts it: "Water is our very life. Do they expect us to surrender our lives on a silver platter? They will be fighting for their expected profits; we will be fighting for our very lives."


North
Postal workers consider blacking water bills

A Communication Workers Union (CWU) member

One year on from last year’s historic strike, postal workers could well find themselves once again in dispute with Royal Mail – this time over the bills for water charges.

Postal workers are due to debate a proposal that they should refuse to deliver these bills when they come out in April. This issue will be debated in mid April at a meeting of the Communication Workers Union.

If bills come out before this meeting is held, it could well be that individual postal workers will decide not to deliver them until they know the outcome of the meeting. It is unclear what the attitude of Royal Mail management will be to this.

Last year’s strike was over management bullying and harassment. Although the strike was won, little has changed in terms of management attitude. If they decide to take disciplinary action against any postal workers because they are not prepared to be the ones who put the hated water bills through people’s doors, they might end up with another dispute.

If postal workers are prepared to stand by other workers over water bills, we hope working class communities across the board will stand by the postal workers in any dispute that might arise as a result.