| To
defeat non-collection, large mobilisations in the communities that result
in widespread disruption of the service and massive co-ordinated political
pressure are necessary. The campaign in South Dublin is at a decisive
stage.
Since
the start of February the residents of South Dublin County Council (SDCC)
have faced the same onslaught of non-collection as those in Fingal did
last winter. In a regrettable development the bin workers helped clear
the way for the bin tax by agreeing to participate in non-collection and
the tag system on 30 January.
SDCC have issued a large number of waivers in an attempt to get the tax
established. For other households they are issuing yellow stickers if
people come to an agreement regarding the paying of arrears, which must
be accompanied by a tag if the bin is to be collected. They are trying
to impose this system ridgidly.
In the first week the majority of households either did not tag or did
not present their bins for collection as a clear sign that they did not
support the tax. To show the lengths that the Council were prepared to
go, they wrote to campaign activists citing that certain leaflets and
letters were an illegal breach of the High Court injunction and threatening
committal proceedings. So much for the right to free speech. The indications
are that industrial action by the bin workers themselves would be outlawed
on the basis of the extensive injunction the High Court gave.
Community
protests
Undeterred
activists in Whitechurch, Templeogue, Greenhills, St. Dominics, Oldbawn,
Kilnamanagh, Spring-field, Jobstown, Clondalkin and Palmerstown mobilised
to try to ensure that the bins of non-payers were collected and to protest.
Trucks have been tracked down and slow marched around to facilitate activists
in dumping the rubbish or stopped for significant periods. Once again
the garda’ have been very quick to assist the Council in imposing
the tax. Socialist Party members have been to forefront in the battle.
Fighting non-collection and a tag system is difficult. Most people do
not believe that they can organise an alternative to the council bin service
on an indefinite basis. That's why when generalised non-collection is
imposed, a limited time frame opens up in which either the Council is
forced to retreat or the campaign tends to be pushed back.
To defeat non-collection, large mobilisations in the communities that
result in widespread disruption of the service and massive co-ordinated
political pressure are necessary. The campaign in South Dublin is at a
decisive stage.
Political
pressure
It
is vital that working class communities see the general significance of
the bin tax campaign and the real role of all the establishment parties
on this issue. It is very important that activists get organised on an
area by area and estate by estate basis. The public meetings held throughout
the Council area in the week before non-collection was implemented were
attended by well over a thousand residents. That shows the potential that
exists.
The parties, in particular Fianna Fail, must feel the full force of the
opposition against all the stealth taxes that are really eating into people's
wages.
It is vital that the campaign in South Dublin fights non-collection as
fully as it can. Political initiatives are already underway. Leaflets
explaining the role of Fianna Fail are being dropped into houses that
have been affected by non-collection.
In Tallaght, large posters are being put up which "Name and Shame"
the Fianna Fail public representatives. Such political protests should
be implemented in all areas in the run in to the local elections in June.
|
| True
to form, Dublin City Council has now employed a debt collector to try
and scare people into paying the bin tax.
Thousands of households all over Dublin have received letters
from Legal and Trade, a debt collection agency based on the Navan Road,
in the form of "draft summonses".
This is a new low in the Council's disgraceful bullying tactics.
"Draft summonses" have no legal standing whatsoever. Only a
court can issue a summons. The campaign has and continues to provide legal
advice and representation to anybody who receives a summons. The campaign
is also challenging the validity of Dublin City's bin tax in the courts.
When people were first taken to court in 2002, the campaign lawyers kicked
this issue into touch for two years by challenging the judgement in the
High Court.
For two years, this prevented the Council from using the courts to break
non-payment. A similar challenge in the High Court is now being prepared,
which will hopefully tie the Council further up in knots.
This would be an important stalling tactic for the campaign. It seems
more and more clear that the Council is not prepared, so close to the
local elections, to implement non-collection. Even in areas where they
tried to implement non-collection before Christmas they have reverted
to collection of all bins.
Clearly the campaign has been able to give the politicians the jitters
and until after the local elections they are wishing this issue away.
We can't let them get away with this. The elections in June should be
used to punish Fianna F‡il and the other establishment parties that
support the bin tax.
There is no doubt, however, that once the elections are over, the issue
of non-collection will be on the agenda. It is up to the local campaigns
now to use the local elections to put extra pressure on the politicians
but crucially to prepare for what will follow after June.
Strengthening the active base of the campaign all over the city is still
key. It is essential that in all areas there is a network of local people
committed to organise their neighbours and friends to come out on the
streets to stop non-collection once they dare implement it in our communities.
|
| "Grow
up, be mature and stop the nonsense" - these were the words of Environment
Minister Martin Cullen last month addressing the concerns of Cork residents
opposed to the siting of a national toxic waste incinerator at Ringaskiddy.
Despite
the fact that more than 16,000 objections were lodged to the planning
applications, that Cork County Council voted against the project and that
Bord Pleanala's referee who chaired the oral hearing made 14 recommendations
against planning permission, Bord Pleanala voted 8-1 in January to give
the green light to the incinerator.
Belgian multinational Indaver now plans to build two incinerators capable
of burning 200,000 tonnes of hazardous, industrial, commercial and municipal
waste per annum, to be operational by 2007.
A report from the University of Exeter a number of years ago stated: "It
is now established that a broad range of health effects have been associated
with living near incinerators. Such effects include cancer, adverse impacts
on the respiratory system, heart disease, immune system effects, increased
allergies and congenital abnormalities".
Residents of the Cork harbour communities are preparing to raise funds
for a High Court appeal. A case is worth pursuing to slow down the process
and to offer a slim chance of victory, but the Bord Pleanala judgment
shows that the State is no friend of the people and no reliance should
be placed on the High Court to win the day.
Hand in hand with court action, preparations must be made now for a huge
"people power" campaign to stop the incinerator. This would
have to take the form of "direct action" - preparing people
in their hundreds to physically block construction of the project, defying
the law if necessary. This approach has stopped incinerators in the US
and it can work here too. |